Published On: Tue, Jan 2nd, 2018

Transgender locker room, bathroom and privacy battle in Illinois will rage on in 2018

A federal court Friday declined to temporarily stop an Illinois school district from enforcing policies that authorize a male student to use the girls’ locker rooms. Because the decisionallows an ongoing risk of privacy violations while the case continues in court, Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys representing 51 families say that they are considering an immediate appeal.

“School policies should promote the rights and safety of all students, no matter who they are, but the school district placed its political preferences ahead of that and ahead of the law,” said ADF Senior Counsel Gary McCaleb. “Because the court should have suspended the district’s privacy-violating policies, we will likely appeal.”

The district opened its schools’ restrooms to the opposite sex—without informing parents—and then opened the girls’ locker room to a boy after the Obama administration’s Department of Education threatened the district’s federal funding. Under the Trump administration, the agency rescinded the Obama administration’s attempt to rewrite federal law and restored the longstanding interpretation of Title IX.

That 1972 federal law prohibits schools from discriminating “on the basis of sex,” which for more than 40 years has meant “male” or “female.” Title IX’s existing regulations specifically state that a school receiving federal funds can “provide separate toilet, locker room, and shower facilities on the basis of sex” without putting that funding at risk.

ADF attorneys represent families consisting of more than 130 students and parents in the lawsuit, Students and Parents for Privacy v. United States Department of Education, filed in the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Illinois.

“Any safety and privacy policy must respect the needs of all children because every child matters,” McCaleb said. “No child should be forced into an intimate setting—like a locker room—with another child of the opposite sex, and no school should impose a policy that so clearly violates the right to bodily privacy. Parents have a right to protect their children’s privacy, and the district must listen to the parents and students they are paid to serve.”

photo courtesy of LC.org

On the DISPATCH: Headlines  Local  Opinion

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter

* indicates required

About the Author

- The generic Dispatch designation, used primarily for press releases or syndicated content, but may be used for guest author requesting a generic nomenclature

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>



The Global Dispatch Facebook page- click here

Movie News Facebook page - click here

Television News Facebook page - click here

Weird News Facebook page - click here