The Truth of Genesis: A Letter To the U.S. Supreme Court
Professor Isaac Asimov (1920 – 1992) wrote many books on science, including astronomy, physics, pulsars, the Moon, and other celestial bodies. He made the following observation: “What in blazes is our moon doing way out there?
It’s too far out to be a true satellite of Earth, it’s too big to have been captured by the Earth. The chances of such a capture having been effected and the Moon then having taken up a nearly circular orbit about the Earth are too small to make such an eventuality credible. But, then, if the Moon is neither a true satellite of the Earth nor a captured one, what is it?”
The Earth and the Moon are the only planetary bodies that modern mankind has set seismic observation networks in place. Data analyses of them both indicate that the Earth and Moon are homogeneous spheres, with solid cores…, until factual application has now proven otherwise.
NASA has known the Moon to be hollow for decades. In November 1969, the Apollo 12 mission allowed its lunar ascent module to crash back to the Moon. NASA was surprised that the Moon “rang like a bell” for over an hour.
With Apollo 13, the third stage rocket was sent to impact the moon, and the reverberations lasted for about three hours and twenty minutes.
What does that do to the “Big Bang” theory? Hollow planets and celestial bodies disprove such theories.
The barycenter between Earth and the Moon is about 280 miles beneath the surface of the Earth, proving the Earth also to be hollow (lack of mass), which is an impossibility for any naturally occurring binary system. The Moon moves closer to the Earth September to March, and further away March to September, to stay in sync with our distance from the Sun, so that they always appear to be the exact same size as viewed from the Earth.
Random chance? So how did the hollow Earth obtain the hollow Moon?
Since the Moon wasn’t captured, nor is it debris that convalesced into a perfect sphere, what force or intelligence placed the Moon in an uniquely circular orbit?
A man named Ronald Regehr wrote “As outrageous as the Moon-is-a-spaceship-theory (brought here by aliens) is, it is the only theory that is supported by all of the data and there is no data that contradicts this theory.”
This is a perfect example of what stupid lengths mankind will go, to avoid admitting that a “god” created our universe.
How does the spaceship theory expose a hidden “God denial” agenda?
Because according to the other solar system origin theories, there was massive bombardment across the solar system in its infancy. Aliens from another, more established solar system, would have had to construct the Moon more than 4 billion years ago, during a lull in the bombardment, set its course around an infant lifeless rocky Earth (for no reason) and the bombardment would later continue.
Our Moon is proof positive of a “creator” of supreme intelligence and power. The name of that Creator is/was Yehovah.
what is going on here. Have we really regressed this far is understanding what actual science is and not make up stuff. Who ever wrote this article needs to jump off the nearest building so he can meet his God ( not) and leave the air and food for the rest of the normal people
What an ignorant and intolerant thing to propose to someone who disagrees with you! Science has proved nothing when it comes to homosexuality, in fact, it’s more concerning because the data shows such ill effects of children with only one parent and how missing out on the “other gender” damages them – so what will it be the kids with 2 mommies and no daddy.
“Jump off the nearest buidling” – you should be ashamed.
Free speech is our most precious possession in America and you can’t handle the opposing voice, shame on you
Shame on you.
Our most precious possession in America is free speech and you’re great rebuttal is “jump off the nearest building” – pathetic.
What has the “actual science” done here, relevant to Cummings’ article? Science has shown nothing positive about same-sex marriages.
We look to Europe, where the rainbow flags soar high and proud, and we find more out of wedlock children being born that ever. By not promoting a traditional family structure for raising kids, we end up promoting illegitimacy, which leads to poverty, crime, and higher welfare costs
If marriage isn’t about children, what institution is about children?
[…] The Truth of Genesis: A Letter To the U.S. Supreme Court […]
[…] The Truth of Genesis: A Letter To the U.S. Supreme Court […]