Published On: Mon, Dec 16th, 2013

Cross at Mount Soledad war memorial must be torn down: ‘unconstitutional government endorsement of Christianity’

The cross at a historic war memorial must be torn down as a federal judge has ruled it is an unconstitutional government endorsement of Christianity.

The American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) has been fighting against the cross for years on behalf of atheist war veteran Philip Paulson.

In 2011, the 9th Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the display was unconstitutional as it violates the Establishment Clause of the First Amendment.

“The use of such a distinctively Christian symbol to honor all veterans sends a strong message of endorsement and exclusion,” the court wrote in its 50-page opinion. “It suggests that the government is so connected to a particular religion that it treats that religion’s symbolism as its own, as universal. To many non-Christian veterans, this claim of universality is alienating…”

The decision was then appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court, but the case was rejected for review.

Justice Samuel Alito stated that the court may wish to hear the matter after the local district court rules on the ultimate fate of the cross.

Now U.S. District Judge Larry Burns stated that he had no other choice but to follow the 9th Circuit’s opinion and declare the cross unconstitutional.

“In spite of many secular changes to the memorial, its long sectarian history, as found by the 9th Circuit, effectively prevents the government from purging the religious connotation in any other way,” Burns wrote.

He ordered the cross to be removed within 90 days, but stayed the order pending appeal.

“A national war memorial should stand for all of those who served,” Norma Chavez-Peterson, executive director of the ACLU of San Diego and Imperial Counties, wrote in a news release following the decision. “It is inappropriate and unconstitutional to declare a deeply religious symbol that excludes those outside of that faith as a monument to all veterans.”

But the American Center for Law and Justice (ACLJ), which had filed an amicus brief on behalf of 18 members of Congress who want to save the cross, says that it will continue fighting.

“We will continue to aggressively argue in support of this memorial and commemorative cross,” said Chief Counsel Jay Sekulow. “We believe the law and precedent are clear: The Supreme Court has concluded in the past that ‘a Latin cross is not merely a reaffirmation of Christian beliefs. It is a symbol often used to honor and respect those whose heroic acts, noble contributions, and patient striving help secure an honored place in history for this nation and its people.’”

“This memorial should not create a constitutional crisis,” he added. “It is part of the history and heritage of the San Diego area.”

The case will likely head back to the Supreme Court.

photo by Jay Buffington public domain via wikipedia

photo by Jay Buffington public domain via wikipedia

On the DISPATCH: Headlines  Local  Opinion

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter

* indicates required

About the Author

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>



The Global Dispatch Facebook page- click here

Movie News Facebook page - click here

Television News Facebook page - click here

Weird News Facebook page - click here