Creationism is a misrepresentation; science is insane!

 Current Creationism is in a delusion, refusing to learn the truth of Genesis.  Secular science is mired in the idiocy of Atheism, to the point of withholding the truth from the public, because they can’t come up with a natural explanation for certain “phenomena” in our universe.

donkeyhotey donkeyhotey.wordpress.com

First, let’s deal with “young Earth” Creationism.  In Genesis 1:2, it begins the description of the first day revealed to Moses, on Mt. Sinai, in 1598 BC.  In that first segment, God says “Let there be light”.  Why did God say that?  It’s because there was no light, but only darkness.  But “God is Light, and in Him is no darkness at all”.  Where did God have to go in order to find darkness?  How did it get there in the first place?  While we’re at it, why didn’t God say “Let there be a planet covered with water”?  It’s because that at the time God said “Let there be light”, in the vision given to Moses, the water covered Earth was already there, showing the results of a previous global flood, more than 9 million years ago.  The flood of Noah, which was in 2611 BC, was only the most recent of multiple global floods in Earth’s history, and is insignificant as far as explaining the fossil record.  The folly of YEC’s refuses to acknowledge this.

In order to make their premise more plausible, YEC’s claim that Noah took infant species of the many large animals into the ark, in order to have room for them all.  But that is a lie. 

In Genesis 7:2, it says:

 Of every clean beast thou shalt take to thee by sevens, the male and his female: and of beasts that are not clean by two, the male and his female.

The above verse reveals two things; 1) no infants were taken into the ark, because they don’t have mates, and 2) there were seven pairs of the clean beasts, and one pair of unclean beasts.  Were there fourteen indricotheriums and fourteen brontotheriums (which died out 24 million years ago) in the ark?  Brontotheriums were eight feet high at the shoulder, and sixteen feet long.  Indricotheriums were fifteen feet high at the shoulder, forty feet long, and their heads were twenty-six feet high.

If you take all of the land animals that ever lived, both modern and prehistoric, clean and unclean, there was not enough room in one ark to hold them all.  In the book of Leviticus, God gives a list of clean and unclean animals, which Moses referred to when writing in Genesis.  Young Earth Creationism misrepresents the Genesis text, and is both foolish and deceitful.

I often wonder which is worse: the foolish “young Earth” believers, or the infidel “old Earth” believers?

Old Earth teachers deny the literal truth of scripture, and call both God and Moses a liar.

In the Fourth Day, Moses records God as saying “Let there be lights in the firmament of the heaven to divide the day from the night; and let them be for signs, and for seasons, and for days, and years:”.  Old Earth teachers claim that there was cloud cover, and God just removed the clouds so Moses could see the cosmos.  So did Moses make that stuff up?  So why would God say “let there be lights..”, if He could have said “Let the clouds fade away”?  Also, a “sign” is pointless unless there is a human on Earth to see it.

Genesis chapter one tells us that in the sixth vision given to Moses, God made the land animals from the ground, and human male and female, before the day was gone.  Each vision given to Moses was only twelve hours.  How can you justify theistic evolution from scripture?  Aren’t they just “grasping for straws”?  It is so sad to see the failed attempts of false teachers to explain the scriptures, such as “the framework hypothesis”, progressive, day-age, theistic evolution, and the gap theory.  These infidels do not believe God, nor have respect for God’s Word.

Finally, when are people going to start questioning the “lame” explanations that science gives us concerning our universe?  Take Shoemaker-Levy-9 for example.  The comet was a “string of 21 pearls”, stretched out for about 2 million miles, which poses an obvious problem.  Since science surmised that the comet broke apart in July 1992, on its last orbit around Jupiter, why is it that the trailing fragment “A” (near side, in and out bound) of the comet, at the time of fragmentation, waited in space, while the fragment  “W” (far side, in and out bound) and others continued on with its orbital path?  In other words, how did the fragments form a near straight line, an average of about 98,000 miles apart, following each other, seven hours apart?   Did each fragment “wait in suspension” for about seven hours for its turn and the word “go”?  That’s ridiculous, and I challenge the world of science to explain this.  If it broke apart, it should have remained a cluster, not a near straight line.

Fragment “A” was always closest to (facing) Jupiter, and fragment “W” was always furthest away from Jupiter.  That means that the comet was like a marching line (squad) of troops, falling behind Jupiter at about a rate of (minus) one mile per second for about twelve months, then doing a “to the rear, march”, and overtaking Jupiter for the next twelve months at about a rate of  (plus) one mile per second.

The truth is, that God has given comets a guidance system, similar to what mankind has given to rockets and spacecraft.  Blow up a balloon, then let it go, a see what happens.  The Creator made the “string of pearls”, and commanded it to orbit Jupiter from the beginning of our creation, 4.6 billion years ago.  The impacts were a staged “sign”, given to mankind, to reveal an upcoming event on Earth.  If there were twenty-one impacts, expect a major event to occur on Earth (probably in Israel or the USA) in July 2015.