‘Abortion convention’: Burning aborted babies for energy is ‘bad PR’ but a ‘good idea’
Shocking confessions by abortion advocates just became more horrifying as they share their enthusiasm for the burning of aborted babies into “energy” to power homes, but appear to hold back due to bad public relations.
In one video leaked to the public by Got News, reportedly taped on April 7, 2014, at the annual National Abortion Federation meeting in San Francisco, an abortion panel discusses burning the bodies of aborted babies for energy.
One panelist admits: “[I]t’s a PR nightmare for us. If we end up being the front page of the paper, ‘Fetuses are being used for energy.’ I mean–I think it’s a great idea, but…”
According to one abortion staff member present, it’s more than just a “great idea” to abortion advocates. It’s actually already happened.
A staff member from Canada appears to speak from experience (right about the 15 minute mark in the video below) bringing up using “fetuses for energy” to the NAF panel. She is personally “having to deal with a big sort of explosion of the incineration of fetal and stillbirths being used in waste-to-energy facility.”
The woman explains:
But we’re, we are as well. So we’re all linked probably to Stericycle as well. So our hospital in Canada, we contract out, and it’s going down to Portland, and Portland is a waste-to-energy facility. … But it potentially presents a lot of challenges for us, not just logistically and legally, but also politically. Because now the NHS of course, you know the hospitals, they were ordered that they’re not supposed to dispose of their fetal remains outside the whole–I don’t know what they’re gonna do. But–
The NAF panelist interrupts, having already stated that making dead babies and their parts into energy “seems like a really good solution” to the abortion industry’s disposal problem. This time, she seemingly corrects herself when she initially refers to aborted babies as “dead bodies”:
It’s also a potential PR nightmare. … This country [the U.S.] doesn’t want to deal with death. And dead bodies. And whether, or tissue. … [S]o we pretend like that doesn’t happen. But when you want to have a real discussion, nobody’s ready for it. And…it’s a PR nightmare for us. If we end up being the front page of the paper, “Fetuses are being used for energy.” I mean–I think it’s a great idea…
The Canada staff member agrees, telling NAF that her facility turns aborted babies from “waste” into “energy,” and chiefly agreeing that it’s not something she’d care to discuss with the media:
No certainly, I don’t mean to threaten you, but certainly, ours is a waste-to-energy facility, and so when I found out I thought, “Shit. Let’s hope we don’t–” you know, at the end my media response wouldn’t end up in something like that. …