Published On: Thu, Sep 13th, 2012

White House denies President misses Intel briefings, the report dismissed as ‘amusing’

The president’s spokesman disputed a Washington Post article that suggested the commander-in-chief has not attended the Presidential Daily Brief (PDB) “more than half the time.”

President Barack Obama studies a document held by Director of National Intelligence James Clapper during the Presidential Daily Briefing in the Oval Office, Feb. 3, 2011. (Official White House Photo by Pete Souza)

The Post article states that during his first 1,225 days in office, Obama attended his PDB just 536 times equating to 43.8% of the time. During 2011 and the first half of 2012, his attendance became even less frequent — falling to just over 38%. By contrast, Obama’s predecessor, George W. Bush almost never missed his daily intelligence meeting.

The PDB is a daily rundown of threats and developments as assessed by the national security community. It is a top secret written document that is read by the President and his inner circle of security advisors and is often accompanied by in-person briefing by intelligence officials.

The opinion column by Marc Thiessen, a former speech writer for President George W. Bush, cites research by the conservative Government Accountability Institute, which studied Obama’s daily schedule from his first day in office through June 2012.

Asked about the article Monday, White House spokesman Jay Carney said the assertion was “hilarious” :

“He gets it every day, okay? The President of the United States gets the presidential daily briefing every day. There is a document that he reads every day when he is not – well, he always reads it every day because he’s a voracious consumer of all of his briefing materials. And when he is physically here, most days he has a meeting in his office, the Oval one – (laughter) – with participants in – his national security team, including obviously Tom Donilon and others. He also has regular meetings with…”

When pressed harder by the reporter, attempting to distinguish between the “physical briefing” versus a written report, Carney responded.

“This was a case of – I don’t know how far I want to go here, but I believe if you compare our foreign policy record with the one that preceded this one, we’re comfortable with that comparison.”

Carney was interrupted at one point and asked if the report was misleading and the Press Secretary stated that it was “amusing.”

About the Author

- Writer and Co-Founder of The Global Dispatch, Brandon has been covering news, offering commentary for years, beginning professional in 2008 on sites like Examiner and blogs: Desk of Brian, Crazed Fanboy. Appearing on several radio shows, Brandon has hosted Dispatch Radio, written his first novel (The Rise of the Templar) will be a licensed Assembly of God Pastor by the Spring of 2017. "Why do we do this?" I was asked and the answer is simple. "I just want the truth. I want a source of information that tells me what's going and clearly attempts to separate opinion from fact. Set aside left and right, old and young, just point to the world and say, 'Look!'" To Contact Brandon email [email protected] ATTN: BRANDON

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Recent Posts



At the Movies