Quantcast
Published On: Mon, Jun 29th, 2015

Supreme Court rules to allow ‘Choose Life’ license plates in North Carolina

On Monday, the U.S. Supreme Court reversed a lower court decision that had allowed the American Civil Liberties Union to censor North Carolina’s “Choose Life” message, which the state legislature voted to make available on a specialty license plate. The Supreme Court vacated the decision and ordered the U.S. Court of Appeals for the 4th Circuit to reconsider the case in light of the high court’s June 18 decision in another license plate case, Walker v. Texas Division, Sons of Confederate Veterans.

In February, the 4th Circuit upheld a district court decision that prohibited the state from issuing “Choose Life” plates unless it also issued a pro-abortion plate. That prompted Alliance Defending Freedom attorneys and an allied attorney representing Phil Berger, president pro tempore of the North Carolina Senate, and Thom Tillis, then speaker of the North Carolina House of Representatives (now a U.S. senator) to ask the U.S. Supreme Court to hear the case, Berger v. American Civil Liberties Union of North Carolina.

 

“The First Amendment does not allow groups like the ACLU to suppress a state’s positive message just because the state does not also simultaneously approve a conflicting negative message,” said ADF Senior Counsel Steven H. Aden. “Citizens of North Carolina have the freedom to promote messages on their vehicles that their legislature has expressly adopted through license plate legislation.”

Choose Life North Carolina license plateIn the Walker case, the Supreme Court held that Texas’s license plate program constituted government speech, and that Texas therefore could reject plates with messages that contradicted the state’s public policy.

“Third parties like the ACLU cannot sanitize the public square of views a state communicates simply because they do not like those messages,” added lead counsel Scott Gaylord, one of more than 2,500 private attorneys allied with ADF and a professor of law at Elon University School of Law. “As the Supreme Court made clear in Walker, the attempt to censor a message like North Carolina’s ‘Choose Life’ message is inconsistent with both the purpose of the First Amendment and the Supreme Court’s government speech precedents.”

More from ADF – click here

On the DISPATCH: Headlines  Local  Opinion

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter

* indicates required
/ ( mm / dd ) [ALL INFO CONFIDENTIAL]

About the Author

- The generic Dispatch designation, used primarily for press releases or syndicated content, but may be used for guest author requesting a generic nomenclature

Tags

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Sign up for our Weekly Newsletter



Categories

Archives

At the Movies



Pin It