Quantcast
Published On: Thu, Nov 19th, 2015

Nebraska: ADF leads cry to reject open restrooms, locker rooms to appease transgenders

Alliance Defending Freedom has issued letters to the Nebraska School Activities Association and all school districts within the state that encourage them to reject proposed rules that would open restrooms and locker rooms to opposite-sex students. The letters provide a suggested policy that addresses any concerns about discrimination without allowing the sharing of restrooms and changing areas.

The letters explain that no federal law requires public schools to allow boys into girls’ restrooms or girls into boys’ restrooms. In fact, as the letters note, schools and school districts could be exposing themselves to legal liability for violating students’ right to bodily privacy.

photo Marcus Werthmann

photo Marcus Werthmann

“Protecting students from inappropriate exposure to members of the opposite sex is not only legal, it’s an important duty of officials who watch over our children,” said ADF Legal Counsel Matt Sharp. “Letting boys into girls’ restrooms and changing areas, for example, is an invasion of privacy and a threat to student safety.”

The ADF letters cite pertinent legal precedent, including court rulings that support the ability of public schools to limit restrooms and locker rooms to members of the same sex for privacy and safety reasons without violating Title IX, a federal law concerning sex discrimination in public school programs and activities.

“Allowing students to use opposite-sex restrooms and locker rooms would seriously endanger students’ privacy and safety, undermine parental authority, violate religious students’ free exercise rights, and severely impair an environment conducive to learning…,” the ADF letters explain. “ADF’s policy allows schools to accommodate students with unique privacy needs, including transgender students, while also protecting other students’ privacy and free exercise rights, and parents’ right to educate their children. It also serves to better insulate school districts from legal liability.”

“If a district adopts our model policy and it is challenged in court, Alliance Defending Freedom will review the facts and, if appropriate, offer to defend that district free of charge,” the letter to the school districts states.

“Schools can accommodate the small percentage of students that have different preferences without compromising the rights and completely understandable needs of the vast majority of children and their parents,” added ADF Senior Legal Counsel Jeremy Tedesco. “No child should be forced into an intimate setting – like a bathroom or a locker room – with a person of the opposite sex.”

 

On the DISPATCH: Headlines  Local  Opinion

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter

* indicates required
/ ( mm / dd ) [ALL INFO CONFIDENTIAL]

About the Author

- The generic Dispatch designation, used primarily for press releases or syndicated content, but may be used for guest author requesting a generic nomenclature

Tags

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Sign up for our Weekly Newsletter



Categories

Archives

At the Movies



Pin It