Quantcast
Published On: Mon, Jun 27th, 2016

Maryland county battles Jeffrey Davis over Ten Commandments monument

Alliance Defending Freedom and Jones Day attorneys representing the Allegany County commissioners filed a motion to dismiss a lawsuit that seeks to uproot a Ten Commandments monument on the county courthouse grounds that is nearly identical to one the U.S. Supreme Court upheld in 2005.

Jeffrey Davis, who resides in a neighboring county but owns property in Allegany County, filed the lawsuit to have the monument, located on the courthouse lawn, removed because “he is offended” by it, his complaint from March says.

photo/ JW1805 wia wikipedia, public domain

photo/ JW1805 wia wikipedia, public domain

“A Ten Commandments monument isn’t unconstitutional simply because someone says he is offended by it,” said ADF Senior Counsel Brett Harvey. “The Supreme Court clarified this issue when it upheld a virtually identical monument in Texas. The emotional response of an offended passerby doesn’t automatically amount to a violation of the Establishment Clause.”

In 1957, the Fraternal Order of Eagles donated the monument, which stands not far from a monument to George Washington. In its 2005 decision in Van Orden v. Perry, the high court upheld the constitutionality of a nearly identical monument, also donated by FOE, on the grounds of the Texas Capitol complex. The court ruled that the monument did not violate the Establishment Clause.

In its 2014 ruling in the ADF case Town of Greece v. Galloway, the Supreme Court questioned the legitimacy of “offended observer” claims, saying that adults “often encounter speech they find disagreeable; and an Establishment Clause violation is not made out any time a person experiences a sense of affront from the expression of contrary religious views….”

“A passive monument acknowledging our nation’s religious heritage resting unchallenged for nearly 60 years cannot be interpreted as the government establishing a religion,” Harvey explained. “Since the Supreme Court has already settled this matter, we are asking the district court to dismiss this case.”

Jones Day attorneys Noel Francisco, James Uthmeier, and Kaytlin Roholt, three of more than 3,000 private attorneys allied with ADF, are co-counsel on behalf of the county commissioners in the case, Davis v. Shade, in the U.S. District Court for the District of Maryland.

On the DISPATCH: Headlines  Local  Opinion

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter

* indicates required
/ ( mm / dd ) [ALL INFO CONFIDENTIAL]

About the Author

- The generic Dispatch designation, used primarily for press releases or syndicated content, but may be used for guest author requesting a generic nomenclature

Tags

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Sign up for our Weekly Newsletter



Recent Posts

Do You Need A Lawyer For A Divorce?

May 30, 2023, Comments Off on Do You Need A Lawyer For A Divorce?

Proving Negligence in a Personal Injury Case

May 30, 2023, Comments Off on Proving Negligence in a Personal Injury Case

Things to Consider Before Getting A Home Warranty for Your New Home

May 16, 2023, Comments Off on Things to Consider Before Getting A Home Warranty for Your New Home

Have You Heard About Mesothelioma? Here Are Some Things to Know

May 16, 2023, Comments Off on Have You Heard About Mesothelioma? Here Are Some Things to Know

Top Gym Liability Insurance Plans: Secure Your Fitness Business with Unbeatable Coverage

May 5, 2023, Comments Off on Top Gym Liability Insurance Plans: Secure Your Fitness Business with Unbeatable Coverage
rabies

Dog Bite Incidents: Prevention, Liability, and Seeking Legal Assistance

May 5, 2023, Comments Off on Dog Bite Incidents: Prevention, Liability, and Seeking Legal Assistance

Categories

Archives