Quantcast
Published On: Tue, Mar 27th, 2018

Judge rules for YouTube in PragerU censorship case

A federal judge has dismissed conservative commentator Dennis Prager’s lawsuit against YouTube for blocking younger viewers from seeing many of his educational videos.

According to a Reuters report, U.S. District Judge Lucy Koh ruled that YouTube did not violate the free speech of Prager University (PragerU), the nationally-syndicated radio host’s ongoing series of educational videos, because it is a private entity.

public domain photo/’65 Pontiac

“Defendants are private entities who created their own video-sharing social media website and make decisions about whether and how to regulate content that has been uploaded on that website,” Koh ruled. “Plaintiff has not shown that defendants have engaged in one of the very few public functions that were traditionally exclusively reserved to the state.”

She also ruled that YouTube’s official justification for the restrictions, they are not age-appropriate, did not constitute false advertising.

A statement responding to the news on Prager’s official website notes that the judge’s ruling makes a “startling omission” that YouTube’s own self-description as a “community where everyone’s voice can be heard” no matter their “point of view” is “mere ‘puffery.’” Thus, the decision cannot be binding because it is so vague that it cannot be proved false.

On his radio show, Prager has said he would have “no issue” with YouTube’s censorship if it was upfront about having political positions rather than claiming to be neutral.

Google and YouTube have been at the heart of several recent censorship controversies.

During the past few months, the internet search giant has removed revenue-generating ads from several Life Site News articles it deemed to be “dangerous or derogatory.”

YouTube recently enlisted the left-wing Southern Poverty Law Center to help police “hateful” content, despite its record of applying the “hate group” label to numerous mainstream conservative organizations.

Prager attorney Peter Obstler said PragerU is currently considering its options for how to respond, and may appeal the ruling.

“Google and YouTube do this not because they have identified video content that violates their guidelines or is otherwise inappropriate for younger viewers,” Eric George, the attorney representing PragerU, said, “but because PragerU is a conservative nonprofit organization that is associated with and espouses the views of leading conservative speakers and scholars.”

RELATED…

Google email confirms censorship, calls Ben Shapiro, Jordan Peterson, Dennis Prager ‘Nazis using dog whistles’

Facebook tells PragerU they are sorry for censoring their videos, suppressing others

Black student Wylliam Smith calls for segregation at University of Iowa

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter

* indicates required
/ ( mm / dd ) [ALL INFO CONFIDENTIAL]

About the Author

- Catherine "Kaye" Wonderhouse, a proud descendant of the Wunderhaus family is the Colorado Correspondent who will add more coverage, interviews and reports from this midwest area.

Tags

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

Sign up for our Weekly Newsletter



Categories

Archives

At the Movies