Quantcast
Published On: Wed, Apr 9th, 2014

Florida abortion bill moves ahead, would ban procedures based on ‘viability’ of child

Florida lawmakers are moving forward with a proposal that would place additional restrictions on abortions, largely barring the procedures if doctors determine that fetuses have reached viability.

The House is expected to take up its version of the proposal (HB 1047) Wednesday, while the Senate Judiciary Committee approved the Senate version (SB 918) on Tuesday in a party-line vote.

The supporters point to medical advances that have enabled premature babies to survive more often. Florida law places the third trimester as the time after the 24th week of pregnancy.

“Because of medical advances, there are babies that are being born at 20, 21, 19 weeks,” said Senate sponsor Anitere Flores, R-Miami.

But the proposed restrictions drew intense debate Tuesday, with Sen. Arthenia Joyner, D-Tampa, saying the legislation “ties the hands” of physicians.

“Abortion is a deeply emotional, personal and complex decision that should be left to a woman, her family, her faith and her doctor,” she said. “And we’re not doing this here.”

Under current law, abortions in most cases are barred during the third trimester of pregnancy, but these bills would require that physicians conduct examinations before performing abortions to determine if fetuses are viable.

If they are deemed “viable” then the abortions would not be allowed, preventing abortions around the 20th week and later.

If the proposal ultimately passes, it would not affect the vast majority of abortions. The state had 71,503 reported abortions in 2013, with 65,098 performed during the first 12 weeks of pregnancy, 6,405 performed from the 13th to 24th weeks and none performed later, according to a Senate staff analysis.

The proposed bills would change the circumstances in which third-trimester abortions could legally be performed. Under current law, third-trimester abortions are allowed if they are necessary to save a pregnant woman’s life or preserve her health.

The proposals would make that standard more restrictive, saying third-trimester abortions would be allowed to save a pregnant woman’s life “or avert a serious risk of imminent substantial and irreversible physical impairment of a major bodily function of the pregnant woman other than a psychological condition.”

The more-restrictive standard also would apply to abortions performed after viability, if the rest of the legislation passes.

Photo/Nodar Kherkheulidze via wikimedia commons

Photo/Nodar Kherkheulidze via wikimedia commons

On the DISPATCH: Headlines  Local  Opinion

Subscribe to Weekly Newsletter

* indicates required
/ ( mm / dd ) [ALL INFO CONFIDENTIAL]

About the Author

- Writer and Co-Founder of The Global Dispatch, Brandon has been covering news, offering commentary for years, beginning professionally in 2003 on Crazed Fanboy before expanding into other blogs and sites. Appearing on several radio shows, Brandon has hosted Dispatch Radio, written his first novel (The Rise of the Templar) and completed the three years Global University program in Ministerial Studies to be a pastor. To Contact Brandon email [email protected] ATTN: BRANDON

Leave a comment

XHTML: You can use these html tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <s> <strike> <strong>

like_us_on_facebook

 

The Global Dispatch Facebook page- click here

Movie News Facebook page - click here

Television News Facebook page - click here

Weird News Facebook page - click here 

DISPATCH RADIO

dispatch_radio

THE BRANDON JONES SHOW

brandon_jones_show-logo

Archives